EMET NEWS PRESS

Das Wichtigste in 30 Sekunden

Der Referentenentwurf zur Reform des Nachrichtendienstrechts erweitert die technische, analytische und operative Reichweite von Bundesnachrichtendienst und Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz. Vorgesehen sind eine umfassendere automatisierte Datenauswertung, weiterentwickelte Befugnisse zur strategischen Fernmeldeaufklärung und aktive Maßnahmen gegen technische oder operative Strukturen gegnerischer Akteure. Ein wesentlicher Teil der Reform setzt verbindliche Vorgaben des Bundesverfassungsgerichts um. Die Übergangsfrist für die beanstandeten Vorschriften endet am 31. Dezember 2026.

Die angekündigte Neufassung des Informationsfreiheitsgesetzes könnte den bislang voraussetzungslosen Zugang zu amtlichen Informationen auf natürliche Personen mit berechtigtem Interesse begrenzen. Weitere Eckpunkte betreffen den Wohnsitz oder die Staatsangehörigkeit der Antragsteller, zusätzliche Schutzbereiche und eine stärkere Ausrichtung der Gebühren am Verwaltungsaufwand. Betroffen wären vor allem journalistische Recherche, wissenschaftliche Analyse und zivilgesellschaftliche Kontrolle.

Der Nachrichtendienstentwurf enthält zugleich eine Neuordnung der Aufsicht. Der seit 2022 tätige Unabhängige Kontrollrat soll zusätzliche Zuständigkeiten erhalten. Seine Wirksamkeit hängt von personeller Stärke, technischer Expertise, unmittelbarem Systemzugang und durchsetzbaren Prüfungsrechten ab.

Beide Vorhaben bilden kein gemeinsames Gesetzespaket. Werden die operativen Nachrichtendienstbefugnisse weitgehend verabschiedet und die angekündigten IFG-Hürden umgesetzt, vergrößert sich voraussichtlich der strukturelle Informationsvorsprung der Bundesexekutive.

Kernbefund

Der Referentenentwurf zur Reform des Nachrichtendienstrechts verändert die gesetzliche Stellung des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutz und des Bundesnachrichtendienstes grundlegend. Beide Dienste sollen Bedrohungen weiterhin aufklären und analysieren, künftig jedoch zusätzlich selbst auf bestimmte Gefährdungsabläufe einwirken können.

Die Entwurfsbegründung bezeichnet diese Erweiterung als begrenzte Interventionsbefugnisse beziehungsweise als aktive Schutzmaßnahmen. In der öffentlichen und fachpolitischen Debatte werden sie überwiegend unter dem Begriff aktive Maßnahmen zusammengefasst.

Der Instrumentenkatalog umfasst Telekommunikationsüberwachung, biometrische Identifizierung, Zugriffe auf private informationstechnische Systeme, automatisierte Datenanalysen sowie technische Einwirkungen auf laufende Cyberoperationen. Vorgesehen sind außerdem Maßnahmen, durch die Datenströme verändert, Angriffsinfrastrukturen beeinträchtigt oder beteiligte Akteure gezielt fehlgeleitet werden können.

Private Unternehmen werden unter den gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen zur Auskunft, Datenübermittlung, technischen Unterstützung und Geheimhaltung verpflichtet. Betroffen sind unter anderem Telekommunikationsanbieter, Verkehrsbetriebe, Finanzdienstleister, Fahrzeughersteller, Werkstätten, Hostinganbieter und Betreiber von Videoüberwachungsanlagen.

Das Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik soll technische Erkenntnisse über Cyberangriffe und Sicherheitslücken frühzeitig an den BND weitergeben. Damit entsteht eine engere Verbindung zwischen defensiver Cybersicherheit und nachrichtendienstlicher Nutzung technischer Schwachstellen.

Die operative Rechts- und Datenschutzkontrolle wird beim Unabhängigen Kontrollrat konzentriert. Die G-10-Kommission soll entfallen. Der Entwurf reagiert damit auf Vorgaben des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, erweitert zugleich jedoch Reichweite und operative Wirkung der Nachrichtendienste.

Key Findings

Germany’s right-wing extremist threat environment combines a large extremist personnel base, sustained violence orientation, digitally accelerated mobilisation and regionally capable political-extremist linkage spaces.

The right-wing extremist spectrum comprised 58,700 persons in 2025. Of these, 15,600 were assessed as violence-oriented. Authorities recorded 36,951 offences with a right-wing extremist background, including 1,395 violent offences.

The AfD’s nationwide parliamentary, organisational and digital presence creates a politically relevant resonance environment in which narratives can gain wider visibility and may be adopted, intensified or operationalised by actors in the broader right-wing extremist spectrum.

The decisive operational requirement is the early identification of regional convergence zones where political visibility, extremist networks, digital amplification, local mobilisation capacity and concrete intimidation or violence indicators coincide.

The Essentials in 30 Seconds

The NATO Summit in Ankara on 7–8 July 2026 will formalise a revised Alliance burden architecture. The United States is expected to reaffirm its commitment to Article 5 while reducing selected conventional capability allocations within the NATO Force Model.

European Allies and Canada have largely compensated for the immediate shortfalls through additional force contributions, readiness measures and alternative capability packages. The remaining high-value gaps concern strategic bombers, air-to-air refuelling, persistent ISR, maritime long-range surveillance, carrier-based naval power, sea-based long-range strike and rapid global reinforcement.

The summit will assess whether European defence expenditure can be converted into deployable formations, ammunition production, air and missile defence, command-and-control resilience, military mobility and industrial regeneration capacity.

The central operational issue is the gap between political reassurance and force availability. Article 5 remains the political foundation of collective defence. European readiness, industrial output and sustainment capacity determine the Alliance’s ability to manage simultaneous pressure in Europe, the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific.

Core Findings

The situation between Iran, Israel, the United States, and the Arab Gulf states is not a stable ceasefire, but a limited escalation regime carrying a high risk of relapse. De-escalation efforts rest on the Memorandum of Understanding signed in Islamabad, which establishes a 60-day window for a comprehensive agreement. Two weeks into this window, both sides continue to dispute the interpretation of the signed MOU, making a failure of the initial agreement currently appear more likely than a final settlement. Additionally, a one-week temporary truce is in place for the Strait of Hormuz; renewed clashes remain highly possible immediately after July 4.

Two structural factors dominate the negotiation landscape. First, Iran has institutionalized its claims over the Strait of Hormuz through the newly created Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA). Teheran is operating a de facto transit regime featuring approved corridors, mandatory coordination with the IRGC Navy, and transit fees. Second, following the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Iran is undergoing a leadership succession phase. Mourning ceremonies are scheduled from July 4 to July 9, and the next negotiation meeting has been postponed until their conclusion. This succession represents the primary variable affecting Iran's negotiation mandate, escalation discipline, and the internal cohesion of the Revolutionary Guards.

Militarily, Iran remains weakened—US strikes have repeatedly degraded its missile, drone, and coastal radar capabilities according to CENTCOM reports—yet strategically operational. Teheran's operational impact stems from its capacity to project power across multiple theaters simultaneously: the maritime domain (Hormuz, Persian Gulf, Red Sea), ground fronts (Northern Israel, Southern Lebanon, Iraq, Syria), the Gulf monarchies hosting US forces, and critical digital infrastructure. Israel and the United States maintain clear advantages in air power, ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance), target development, precision strikes, missile defense, and maritime projection. While this superiority is sufficient to repeatedly degrade Iranian infrastructure, it fails to permanently deter Iran from maritime coercion, missile reconstitution, cyber operations, or supporting terrorist and other armed proxies.

Key Judgment

Russian forces have measurably expanded their capacity for tactical adaptation since 2024, yet highly likely continue to fail at converting tactical penetrations into operational breakthroughs. From this discrepancy, eight exploitable weakness complexes emerge: the unprotected consolidation phase following infiltrations, the predictability of reconnaissance-by-force, the dependence of small assault groups on rearward connectivity, the incomplete handoffs within combined arms operations, the concentration of key personnel in centralized drone structures, the channeling of movement corridors, the exposed tactical supply chain, and the recognizable operating pattern of the glide bomb campaign. None of these complexes requires new major weapon systems to exploit; all counter-approaches rest on available means whose effect derives from prioritization and temporal compression.

Methodology and limitations: This assessment draws exclusively on open sources (RUSI, CSIS, ISW, Jamestown Foundation). Reliable Russian casualty and inventory figures are not available. Probability statements follow the scale: almost certain – highly likely – likely – possible.

Key Finding

Several unidentified drones flew in formation over a Swiss military facility. The location, time, platform type, control point and operators remain undisclosed. The military character of the protected site has been confirmed.

Tactical pre-operational reconnaissance aimed at testing detection, alarm procedures and response times is likely. An imminent sabotage or attack operation is not substantiated. There are no reliable technical or forensic indicators supporting attribution to a state actor or intelligence service.

The Chief of the Armed Forces announced a review of the existing catalogue of critical infrastructure. The Armed Forces are now recording drone sightings systematically and are examining a flight-restricted zone above the affected facility. Until integrated Counter-UAS systems are available more widely, passive protection remains the most immediately effective measure.

The Essentials in 30 Seconds

Russia treats Germany as an intelligence, influence and potential disruption environment. Military logistics, defence industry, transport, energy, digital infrastructure and political decision-making are priority target sets.

The 2025 constitutional protection report documents sabotage preparation against transport infrastructure, reconnaissance of military-relevant routes and persistent cyber access. It also identifies the use of low-level agents as a Russian operating pattern. Russian direction of extremist actors in Germany for sabotage has not been proven.

China pursues long-term strategic acquisition and influence activity against technology, research, industry and political target structures. Iran is intensifying surveillance and repression against the exile opposition, Jewish and Israeli institutions, and US-linked targets.

The Essentials in 30 Seconds

• According to the GAO, the U.S. F-35 fleet’s full mission capable rate fell to 25 percent in fiscal year 2025. Forty-four percent of aircraft were mission capable for at least one assigned task.

• Spare-parts shortages, extended depot turnaround times, limited data access, delayed software maturity and insufficient industrial capacity are constraining availability.

• Six U.S. Marine Corps F-35B aircraft were accepted without AN/APG-85 radars. Concurrency now affects a core sensor.

• For the United States and NATO, the ability to generate available F-35 units increasingly depends on the performance of the U.S.-led sustainment system.

F-35 availability constrains the United States’ ability to provide fully mission-capable air forces for sustained multi-role operations. Fleet inventory is growing while spare-parts supply, depot capacity, software maturity and technical support are not expanding at the same rate.

According to the GAO report published in June 2026, the mission capable rate of the U.S. F-35 fleet declined from 67 percent in fiscal year 2021 to 44 percent in fiscal year 2025. This metric measures aircraft able to fly and execute at least one assigned task. The full mission capable rate declined from 38 percent to 25 percent over the same period. Full mission capable status requires an aircraft to perform its complete assigned mission set without a limiting deficiency.

In fiscal year 2025, only around one quarter of the U.S. F-35 fleet could execute all assigned missions. A 44-percent mission capable rate also constrains training, alert commitments, deployment preparation and sustained operations. The shortfall affects the F-35A, F-35B and F-35C, as well as the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.

The Essentials in 30 Seconds

The Netherlands is transforming its Defence Space Security Centre into a Space Command. The move consolidates satellite-based intelligence, space domain awareness, satellite communications, positioning, navigation and timing, and the processing of space-derived data within a joint military command structure.

The initiative does not create an autonomous Dutch space power. It is intended to connect national satellites, ground infrastructure, commercial services and allied data for maritime surveillance, air defence, intelligence support and NATO operations.

A limited initial operational capability is likely by 2028. A resilient 24/7 operational structure with trained shift teams, protected ground segments, independent data fusion and routine NATO integration will depend primarily on personnel recruitment and the maturity of operational data chains.